|
|
Registros recuperados : 21 | |
4. | | ALBÍN, A.; SIERRA, M. Introducción. Innovación: procesos interactivos que generan valor. Cuarta sección. Innovación en agroecología: intercambios que generan valor. Editores: Alfredo Albín y Miguel Sierra. In: Georgina Paula García-Inza; José María Paruelo; Roberto Zoppolo. (eds). Aportes científicos y tecnológicos del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) del Uruguay a las trayectorias agroecológicas. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación CICCUS, 2023. p.413-418. p.413-418.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
7. | | PARUELO, J.; SIERRA, M. Sustainable intensification and ecosystem services: how to connect them in agricultural systems of southern South America. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2023, volume 13, issue 1, pp. 198-206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00791-9 Article history: Accepted 01 August 2022; Published 18 August 2022. Corresponding author: José M. Paruelo, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, INIA,
Colonia, Uruguay, e-mail: jparuelo@inia.org.uy --Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
10. | | BIANCO, M.; CAETANO, G.; SIERRA, M. Alemania y Uruguay: las posibilidades de un futuro bioeconómico a desarrollar. In: Caetano, G.; Beretta Curi, A.; Bianco, M.; Caetano, S.; Mederos, L.; Musselli, V.; Sierra, M.; Vicario, C. Ciencia, tecnología y producción agropecuaria: historia de la cooperación bilateral entre Alemania y Uruguay (1856-2018). Montevideo ,(UY): INIA, Planeta, 2019. p. 307-328.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
17. | | VASEN, F.; SIERRA, M.; PARUELO, J.; NEGRO, C.; NOLLA, F.; LAPETINA, J.; SALVAGNO, M. Evaluation of technical production in agricultural sciences a new certification scheme in Uruguay. [La evaluación de la producción tecnológica en ciencias agrariasun nuevo esquema de certificación en Uruguay.]. [Avaliação da produção técnica nas ciências agrícolas um novo esquema de certificação no Uruguai.] Section: Social Sciences, Rural Sociology and Agrarian Economy. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2021, vol. 25, n.2, article e491. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.491 Article history: Received 30 October 2020; Accepted 01 June 2021; Published 12 July 2021.
Editor: Marta Chiappe Hernández, Universidad de la República Montevideo, Uruguay.
Correspondence: Federico Vasen, Universidad de Buenos Aires,...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
19. | | CAETANO, G.; BERETTA CURI, A.; BIANCO, M.; CAETANO, S.; MEDEROS, L.; MUSSELLI, V.; SIERRA, M.; VICARIO, C. Ciencia, tecnología y producción agropecuaria: historia de la cooperación bilateral entre Alemania y Uruguay (1856-2018). Montevideo (Uruguay) : INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Planeta, 2019. 339 p.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
20. | | TURNER, J.A.; GUESMI, B.; GIL, J. M.; HEANUE, K.; SIERRA, M.; PERCY, H.; BORTAGARAY, I.; CHAMS, N.; MILNE, C. Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay. Evaluation and Program Planning, October 2022, Volume 94, 102127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127 Article history: Received 6 August 2021, Revised 27 April 2022, Accepted 25 June 2022, Available online 28 June 2022, Version of Record 6 July 2022.
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: james.turner@agresearch.co.nz (J.A. Turner),...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 21 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2014 |
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; KOESBANDANA, S.; MAC DONAGH, P.; RUBILAR, R.; BALMELLI, G.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; DE LA TORRE, R.; MURARA, M.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; KOTZE, H.; GONZALEZ, R.; CARRERO, O.; FREY, G.; ADAMS, T.; TURNER, J.; LORD, R.; HUANG, J.; MACINTYRE, C.; MCGINLEY, K.; ABT, R.; PHILLIPS, R. |
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; SADHARGA KOESBANDANA, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Misiones, Argentina; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepcioón, Chile; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, Weyerhaeuser Company, Melo, Uruguay; RAFAEL DE LA TORRE, CellFor, USA; MAURO MURARA, Universidade do Contestado, Santa Catarina, Brasil; VITOR AFONSO HOEFLICH, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil; HEYNZ KOTZE, Komatiland Forests (Pty) Ltd, South Africa; RONALDS GONZALEZ, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; OMAR CARRERO, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; GREGORY FREY, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA; THOMAS ADAMS, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; JAMES TURNER, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand; ROGER LORD, Mason, Bruce, & Girard, Oregon, USA; JIN HUANG, Abt Associates, USA; CHARLES MACINTYRE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; KATHLEEN MCGINLEY, n International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, USA; ROBERT ABT, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; RICHARD PHILLIPS, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA. |
Título : |
Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, v. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010. |
Contenido : |
We estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S. |
Palabras claves : |
EUCALYPTUS; FINANCIAL MODELS; FOREST PLANTATIONS; INVESTMENT RETURNS; PINUS; RISK. |
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN. |
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3567/1/Balmelli-2010-Biomass.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02586naa a2200469 a 4500 001 1051156 005 2019-10-15 008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.05.008$2DOI 100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F. 245 $aGlobal timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. 260 $c2010 500 $aArticle history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010. 520 $aWe estimated financial returns and wood production costs in 2008 for the primary timber plantation species. Excluding land costs, returns for exotic plantations in almost all of South America e Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Paraguay e were substantial. Eucalyptus species returns were generally greater than those for Pinus species in each country, with most having Internal Rates of Return (IRRs) of 20% per year or more, as did teak. Pinus species in South America were generally closer to 15%, except in Argentina, where they were 20%. IRRs were less, but still attractive for plantations of coniferous or deciduous species in China, South Africa, New Zealand, Indonesia, and the United States, ranging from 7% to 12%. Costs of wood production at the cost of capital of 8% per year were generally cheapest for countries with high rates of return and for pulpwood fiber production, which would favor vertically integrated firms in Latin America. But wood costs at stumpage market prices were much greater, making net wood costs for open market wood more similar among countries. In the Americas, Chile and Brazil had the most regulatory components of sustainable forest management, followed by Misiones, Argentina and Oregon in the U.S. 650 $aFORESTACIÓN 653 $aEUCALYPTUS 653 $aFINANCIAL MODELS 653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS 653 $aINVESTMENT RETURNS 653 $aPINUS 653 $aRISK 700 1 $aKOESBANDANA, S. 700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P. 700 1 $aRUBILAR, R. 700 1 $aBALMELLI, G. 700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V. 700 1 $aDE LA TORRE, R. 700 1 $aMURARA, M. 700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V.A. 700 1 $aKOTZE, H. 700 1 $aGONZALEZ, R. 700 1 $aCARRERO, O. 700 1 $aFREY, G. 700 1 $aADAMS, T. 700 1 $aTURNER, J. 700 1 $aLORD, R. 700 1 $aHUANG, J. 700 1 $aMACINTYRE, C. 700 1 $aMCGINLEY, K. 700 1 $aABT, R. 700 1 $aPHILLIPS, R. 773 $tBiomass and Bioenergy, 2010$gv. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|